From any point of view, we can always find arguments to support or refute the Wikileaks project. Justifications are everywhere, but sometimes it's good to review what others have thought about it big. I leave this link to read not only the spine, but the ensuing discussion.
By the way, if you agree and want to add its voice to other (400 thousand have signed in 24 hrs at the time of this post), I leave the invitation made to the campaign in favor of Wikileaks Avaaz.org . One of the arguments Avaaz.org is as follows (copied verbatim):
"WikiLeaks is not acting alone. Is working with leading newspapers worldwide (New York Times, Guardian, Der Spiegel. The Country, etc) to carefully evaluate 250.000 diplomatic cables U.S. and to remove any information whose publication is irresponsible. Only 800 cables have been published to date. WikiLeaks Previous revelations have uncovered cases of torture by governments, the killing of innocent civilians in Iraq and Afghanistan corruption scandals within large corporations "
can sign their support in this link.
Invite is to inform, not to believe everything you read (even this blog), to look at things from a critical standpoint and arguments. Anyone here serve the guts or the batting for comment. We leave to children who are just learning.
0 comments:
Post a Comment